MSTR Cat

Trust Law/Level VII · Property and business/7.2 Business/Lesson 2

The Massachusetts business trust

How the Massachusetts business trust began, what Hecht v. Malley (1924) decided about its tax, and why mutual funds have used it.

Education, not legal advice. Trust law changes from country to country and state to state, and the right structure depends on your situation. Anything you sign should be drafted or reviewed by a qualified lawyer where you live.

The lean path

The cheapest, lowest-tax, simplest and most private route the law allows, best first. Each step names the rule it rests on and the condition that keeps it lawful.

  1. For an investor the cheapest exposure is a low-cost mutual fund whatever its legal form; a fund qualifying under IRC §§851–852 pays little entity tax by distributing at least 90% of its income.
  2. Holding funds inside an IRA or 401(k) defers tax on their distributions; the 2026 limits are $7,500 for IRA contributions and $24,500 for employee 401(k) deferrals.
  3. For someone forming a business, a Massachusetts trust under G.L. c.182 means filing the declaration and an annual report by 1 June; most small owners find an LLC simpler, with a clearer liability statute.
  4. Hecht v. Malley still governs the idea: the label ‘trust’ does not change tax, and a trust carrying on business is taxed as an association, so no structure lawfully makes business income tax-free.
  5. Shareholders of a Massachusetts trust keep a remote personal liability risk; check the declaration of trust for a disclaimer of shareholder liability and an indemnity before investing directly.

MaterialsMassachusetts General Laws Chapter 182, ‘Voluntary Associations and Certain Trusts’, which governs filings by business trustsThe US Supreme Court’s opinion in Hecht v. Malley, 265 U.S. 144 (1924), on law.cornell.eduThe section describing a mutual fund’s legal organisation in its statement of additional information, if you are reading one

Wonder

  1. How could a trust do the work of a company before company law allowed it?
  2. Why did the Supreme Court tax some trusts as if they were corporations?
  3. Could an investor in a Massachusetts trust be personally liable for its debts?

Explore

  1. The Massachusetts business trust grew up in the 19th century. Massachusetts law then made it hard to form a corporation for some purposes, notably holding and developing real estate, without a special act of the legislature. Investors instead conveyed property to trustees under a written declaration of trust. The trustees managed the property, and the beneficial interest was divided into transferable shares or certificates. The result looked and worked much like a corporation, but rested on trust law and contract rather than a corporate charter.
  2. Massachusetts later recognised these arrangements by statute. Chapter 182 of the Massachusetts General Laws covers ‘voluntary associations and certain trusts’ under a written declaration of trust whose beneficial interest is divided into transferable certificates of participation or shares. It requires the trustees to file the declaration of trust with the Secretary of the Commonwealth and to file annual reports. The name ‘Massachusetts business trust’ is also used loosely for similar trusts formed in other states.
  3. In Hecht v. Malley, 265 U.S. 144 (1924), the US Supreme Court considered three Massachusetts trusts and held that they were ‘associations’ taxable under the Revenue Act of 1918. The trustees were not merely collecting income and paying it over; they were associated together in much the same way as the directors of a corporation, carrying on business for the shareholders. The case is an early example of a rule that still holds: for tax, what an arrangement does matters more than its label. Today the line is drawn by Treas. Reg. §301.7701-4 (lesson 7.2.1).
  4. The best-known modern use is the mutual fund. According to the Investment Company Institute (ICI), the first US mutual fund was organised as a Massachusetts business trust, and for decades the form was the most popular choice. Since the late 1980s more funds have organised as Maryland corporations or Delaware statutory trusts, and the ICI says the Delaware statutory trust is now the most favoured form (lesson 7.2.3). A fund’s legal form is stated in its registration documents.
  5. A mutual fund organised as a business trust is not taxed as an ordinary trust. It is generally classified as a corporation for federal income tax and can then qualify as a ‘regulated investment company’ under IRC §851. A regulated investment company that distributes at least 90% of its investment company taxable income each year deducts what it distributes, so it pays little entity-level tax, and its shareholders are taxed on the distributions. That treatment comes from the fund tax rules, not from trust law.
  6. Limited liability was the form’s historic weak point. Investors in a common-law trust had no statute promising that creditors could not reach them, and Massachusetts courts could treat shareholders who controlled the trustees as partners, personally liable for the trust’s debts. Funds therefore put disclaimers of shareholder liability and promises of indemnity in their declarations of trust, and fund lawyers still describe the risk for Massachusetts trust shareholders as remote but present. Delaware’s statute, by contrast, gives beneficial owners the same limit on liability as corporate stockholders. This lesson describes the law; it does not suggest any fund or structure.

Key facts

  • The Massachusetts business trust developed in the 19th century to give investors corporate-style advantages without a special legislative charter.
  • Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 182 requires the trustees of such trusts to file the declaration of trust with the Secretary of the Commonwealth.
  • Hecht v. Malley (1924) held Massachusetts business trusts taxable as ‘associations’ under the Revenue Act of 1918.
  • According to the Investment Company Institute, the first US mutual fund was organised as a Massachusetts business trust.
  • A mutual fund organised as a business trust is generally taxed as a corporation that can qualify as a regulated investment company under IRC §851.
  • Shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust have faced a remote risk of personal liability, which declarations of trust address with disclaimers and indemnities.

Exercise nine, six, three, one

9CollectList up to 9 features of a Massachusetts business trust described in this lesson or in a fund document you are reading (some lists are shorter), such as who holds title, how interests are divided, what is filed with the state and how investors are protected.
6ClusterSort them into 6 categories: formation and filing, ownership of the property, investors’ interests, management, tax treatment, and facts you are unsure about.
3DistillReduce the 6 categories to 3 groups: features that make it look like a trust, features that make it look like a corporation, and questions you would still ask.
1CrystallizeWrite 1 sentence explaining, in your own words, why the Supreme Court in Hecht v. Malley looked past the word ‘trust’.

Fact check

Dates, figures and claims checked against the published sources listed below.

Open in the interactive academy →

PT ES ZH JA KO RU DE FR MS